MÄori Models of Health
~2 min read
Lesson 2 of 5
Notes
MÄori models of health offer distinct frameworks for understanding wellbeing that differ fundamentally from biomedical models. These models are holistic, relational, and spiritually grounded, and their application in clinical practice improves the cultural safety and effectiveness of care for MÄori patients and whÄnau.
Te Whare Tapa WhÄ, developed by Sir Mason Durie, is the most widely known MÄori health model. It uses the metaphor of a whare (house) with four walls (tapa whÄ), each representing a dimension of health. The four dimensions are: taha tinana (physical health), taha hinengaro (mental and emotional health), taha wairua (spiritual health), and taha whÄnau (family and social health). Just as a house requires all four walls to stand, a person requires all four dimensions to be in balance to experience full health. Neglecting any one dimension weakens the whole.
Te Pae MÄhutonga is a model of health promotion adapted from the celestial navigation concept of the Southern Cross. It integrates MÄori values with contemporary public health approaches and acknowledges the importance of whakapapa (genealogy, identity) and te ao MÄori (the MÄori world) in health.
The Meihana Model (also called the Extended WhÄnau Ora model) was developed specifically for clinical use. It situates the patient within their whÄnau and wider social, cultural, and spiritual contexts, providing a framework for clinicians to understand MÄori patients holistically. It incorporates Te Tiriti o Waitangi principles and addresses the social determinants of health from a MÄori perspective.
Other models include MÄori health frameworks that centre whakapapa, mauri (life force/essence), and tikanga MÄori (MÄori customs and practices). Mauri represents the essential life force or vitality of an entity; threats to mauri are threats to health. Tikanga MÄori encompasses the values, customs, and practices that guide MÄori behaviour and that have direct implications for clinical interactions, including around death and dying, spiritual practices, and communal decision-making.
These models collectively emphasise that health is not an individual attribute but a relational and collective state. They challenge the biomedical model''s focus on individual pathology and call for clinical practice that engages whÄnau, acknowledges whakapapa, respects spiritual dimensions, and addresses structural determinants of MÄori health inequity.